June (june.so) alternatives now that it has shut down

Best for: June users who want the lowest-friction path for their historical data and are ready for a much deeper tool.

Pros

• The official destination: June built an export tool and migration guide to move event data into an Amplitude workspace
• Enterprise-grade product analytics: behavioral cohorts, path analysis, and experimentation
• Free Starter plan covers up to 10,000 monthly tracked users and 2M events per month
• Session replay, feature flags, and web experimentation bundled into the plans

Cons

• Much larger and heavier than June was; the simplicity you liked is gone
• Real volume gets expensive, and larger plans are quote-based
• Setup and event modeling assume a dedicated analytics owner
• No email automation: it analyzes, it does not act

Pricing: Starter free (up to 10K MTUs, 2M events/mo); Plus from $49/mo on annual billing; Growth and Enterprise quote-based (as of July 2026).

Honest take: Amplitude is where June's founding team went, and it is the official migration path, so it is the lowest-friction home for your historical data. Be honest with yourself about the trade. June's whole appeal was that it hid Amplitude-grade power behind a simple, opinionated B2B interface. Moving to Amplitude means picking up that power and the complexity that comes with it. Pick it over GetFluxly if you were outgrowing June's simplicity anyway and want serious analytical depth.

Best for: Teams that want clean, focused product analytics with a generous free tier and less setup than Amplitude.

Pros

• Clean, fast core analytics: Insights, funnels, flows, and retention
• Free plan covers up to 1M events per month
• Simpler to get started than Amplitude while still capable
• Session replay included, with volume discounts at higher tiers

Cons

• Growth pricing is per-event and climbs once you pass the free 1M events
• No company-level auto-reports in June's opinionated style out of the box
• Event taxonomy needs ongoing upkeep
• No email automation

Pricing: Free up to 1M events/mo; Growth charges roughly $0.28 per 1,000 events after the first 1M free, with volume discounts; Enterprise quote-based (as of July 2026).

Honest take: Mixpanel is the middle path for a June refugee: more capable than the lightweight open tools, less heavy than Amplitude, with a free tier that covers real usage. You will build your own reports rather than getting June's auto-generated company summaries, but the analysis is stronger. Pick it over GetFluxly when analysis depth matters more than having email in the same tool. We keep a fuller list at /mixpanel-alternatives.

Best for: Teams that want analytics plus session replay, feature flags, and experiments in one platform.

Pros

• All-in-one suite: analytics, replay, flags, experiments, surveys, and a data warehouse
• Very generous free tier: 1M analytics events and 5K session recordings per month
• Usage-based, published pricing with per-product spend caps
• Open source core with SQL access to raw events

Cons

• Far broader than June; more surface area to learn and maintain
• The metered bill gets hard to predict as several products run at once
• No opinionated B2B auto-reports in June's style
• Email exists as a Workflows module rather than a first-class product

Pricing: Free tier (1M events, 5K session recordings per month); usage-based above that; platform add-ons from $250/mo (as of July 2026).

Honest take: PostHog suits a June user who wants to grow into more than analytics: replay, flags, and experiments alongside the charts. It is the opposite of June's minimalism, so go here only if you want that breadth. Pick it over GetFluxly when you use the full suite. If you also want lifecycle email on your events, we compare the trade-off at /vs/posthog.

Best for: Teams that want retroactive autocapture so they never lose an event they forgot to instrument.

Pros

• Autocapture records interactions automatically; define events after the fact
• Free tier covers up to 10,000 monthly sessions with core analytics
• Now part of Contentsquare, with journey analysis across the wider platform
• Useful when you cannot predict which events you will need

Cons

• Paid tiers use sales-led, session-based pricing; you contact sales for a number
• Autocapture volume gets noisy and needs curation
• Heavier and more sales-led than June ever was
• No email automation

Pricing: Free up to 10,000 monthly sessions; Growth and higher tiers are quote-based, session-based pricing (commonly cited from around $3,600/year) (as of July 2026).

Honest take: Heap is worth a look if the June feature you would miss most is not losing data: autocapture means you can analyze events you never explicitly tracked. Pick it over GetFluxly when retroactive capture is the priority and sales-led pricing is acceptable. It is a bigger, more enterprise-shaped tool than June, so it fits teams growing into that rather than those who wanted June's lightness.

Best for: Teams that loved June's lightness and want an open source, cookieless product analytics tool they can self-host.

Pros

• Open source product and web analytics positioned as a Mixpanel alternative
• Cookieless and GDPR-friendly by design
• Free to self-host under AGPL-3.0, or a low-cost cloud plan
• Core product analytics: events, funnels, retention, and user and session views, with SDKs

Cons

• Younger and smaller than the incumbents; fewer integrations and less polish
• No June-style company-level auto-generated reports out of the box
• Self-hosting means you own the infrastructure
• No email automation

Pricing: Cloud from $2.50/mo (usage-based by events); self-hosting is free under AGPL-3.0; 30-day trial, no card (as of July 2026).

Honest take: OpenPanel is the closest match for the part of June that was about being lightweight and cheap. It is open source, cookieless, and you can run it yourself or use a low-cost cloud plan. Pick it over GetFluxly when you specifically want an open source analytics tool you can self-host and you do not need email. It will not hand you June's opinionated reports; you build your own views.

Best for: Teams that loved June's simplicity for SaaS and want analytics plus lifecycle email in one tool.

Pros

• Simple product analytics a small SaaS can run: events, funnels, retention, and revenue attribution
• Cookieless by default with server-side hashed visitor ids; no cookie banner required for analytics
• Email automation built in: transactional triggers, lifecycle flows, and broadcasts on the same events
• Unified customer profiles with anonymous-to-identified stitching and live-count behavioral segments
• One plan at $29/mo, everything included, priced by the profiles you track; 14-day trial, no card
• Bring your own ESP: Resend, AWS SES, Mailgun, Postmark, SendGrid, Brevo, and more

Cons

• Does not reproduce June's company-level auto-generated reports in the same form
• No SQL notebooks, session replay, feature flags, or experimentation platform
• No one-click June data import; you connect and send events going forward

Pricing: $29/mo flat, everything included, priced by the profiles you track. 14-day trial, no card required (as of July 2026).

Honest take: GetFluxly is the closest in spirit to what June was for many teams: a simple, opinionated product analytics tool a small SaaS can actually run. Be honest about the gap. GetFluxly does not recreate June's company-level auto-reports in the same form, and it is not deep enterprise analytics: no SQL notebooks, no session replay, no experimentation. What it adds that June never had is lifecycle email that acts on the same events, cookieless by default. Pick it if you loved June's simplicity and want analytics plus email in one, not if you specifically need June's auto-report format.